Here is my take on the S.C. ruling. I feel that there was language in the opinion and even in some of the dissents that was very favorable to parental rights. If listened to and acted on by Judges and Legislators, these things have the potential of impacting future rulings, changing state laws, and even getting current orders modified. All of this could be good for the parental rights movement and most importantly for our children. We must all remember, however, that Family court Judges are not bound by any of the comments that the Justices made. As we all know, many Trial Court Judges and legislators are biased by their own notion of what is “in the best interests” of children and families. They are “elitists” that feel they are wiser and know better that parents what is best for children. They are more attuned to their own political aspirations than what is truly best for our children. Trial Court Judges will continue to rule based on their “self perceived wisdom” and Legislators will continue to propose legislation that is “for sale to the highest bidder.”

I do feel that the Justices copped out. I feel that as they got into the case, they wished they had never agreed to take the case. I think that their ruling, clearly showed “the ivory tower” nature of their decision. It showed how little they really understand about the “nuts and bolts” of the problem. It showed how little they understand about the emotional and financial harm forced visitation litigation inflicts on children and families. In my opinion, their eagerness to “leave to another day” and case, a ruling on the real Constitutional issues of state intrusion into the family privacy and autonomy of fit parents, confirms the fact that they were very uncomfortable with the issue. Remember, it could be 5, 10, 15, 20 years or more before they would ever accept another case of this type. How much pain and anguish will families have to suffer before the issue is finally resolved? If they truly had a grasp of the importance of their decision to the well-being of children, they would have squarely addressed the issue of Constitutionality head on rather than skirt the issue, as they did.

The AARP is not giving up. Their spokesmen have already issued a statement that grandparents should continue to file suit. The Troxels are not giving up. They have said that if they are not giving visitation they will sue again. The Legislators are not giving up. Many have already issued statements saying their state laws are unaffected. Others, such as Sen. Campbell in Florida already has said that he will reintroduce new legislation that gives a presumption to grandparents even thought the S.C. stated that the parents decision must have special preference. These people and others are determined to have control of our children. We must not let them. What does all of this mean? It means that as fit concerned parents, the battle is far from over. Yes, we may have a few more tools in our arsenal of defense against these unjust laws, but we must work even harder to raise public awareness of the dangers these laws present. We must work to unseat Legislators that support these laws and campaign hard for legislators that oppose them. We must continue to speak loudly regarding the harm these laws do to children and how Legislators that support these laws and grandparents that use these laws, are actually inflicting far greater harm on our children that the “harm they are pretending” these laws prevent or the “perceived benefits” they provide children.

Make no mistake about it. This is a very political issue with tons of contributions and millions of votes provided by those that want control of our children. The only way to fight politics is with politics. We must continue to organize politically and lobby our elected officials to repeal these laws. We must force Legislators and large Corporations to take a stand and only support Legislators and purchase products form Corporations that are willing to commit to and stand firm for parental rights. This is how The Civil Rights Movement and other movements such as Woman’s Suffrage prevailed. We must not be complacent, we fight harder now than ever before. We all know how uninformed many parents, grandparents, Judges, legislators, lawyers and others are regarding how harmful these laws really are. My greatest fear is that with the media coverage of the Supreme Court ruling, these same uninformed people will now feel the issue is resolved. As we all know, the issue is not, nor will never be resolved until there is not one single child in America living under a forced visitation order, and until ALL American families are free from this “Sword of Damocles” that hangs perilously above their heads.

Regards..Grady

Prepared by Grady

Grady's Home Page
Home Page


Copyright © 2000 by ParentsRights.net
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Site Design and Information: WebMaster

The information on this site should not be taken as legal advice or be used as a substitute for seeking the legal advice of an attorney in your area. Remember that each case scenario is different and the information found here are based on one set of facts and not on your particular circumstances. The information given is based solely on the laws of the State of Florida and the USSC rulings. The links listed on this site are not endorsements of this site or it's members but rather a source of more information. Please read this and all other material at your own discretion.